Scales of Governance in Carbon Sinks Global Priorities and Local Realities

نویسنده

  • EMILY BOYD
چکیده

with effects at different scales, local to global. An increasing number of environmental issues exhibit such linkages, both in effect and in driving force, including loss of biodiversity, land degradation, and climate change. It is typically recognized that management of all commons, including the global atmosphere and forests, requires robust institutions to coordinate and cooperate at different scales (Ostrom and Ahn 2003). This involves interactions among institutions both horizontally (spatially) and vertically (across levels of organization), from the global to the local. In recent years, global environmental agreements have proliferated. There have been some two hundred global environmental agreements and protocols, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) and its Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is the first legally binding commitment by nations to curb greenhouse gas emissions to 5 percent below 1990 levels. Under the Protocol, the so-called flexible mechanisms have been established to combat greenhouse gas emissions cost-effectively. One of these mechanisms, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), allows developed countries to offset emissions through energy or forest projects that mitigate carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and allows developing countries to voluntarily participate in efforts to reduce greenhouse gases in return for payments from developed countries. The CDM is considered by many developing countries an important and attractive opportunity Chapter 6

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Health Technology Assessment: Global Advocacy and Local Realities; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (UHC), as long as it is context-specific and considered within deliberative processes at the country level. Institutionalising robust deliberative processes requires significant time and resources, however, and countries often begin by demanding evidence (including local CEA evidence as well as evi...

متن کامل

Polycentrism in Global Health Governance Scholarship; Comment on “Four Challenges That Global Health Networks Face”

Drawing on an in-depth analysis of eight global health networks, a recent essay in this journal argued that global health networks face four challenges to their effectiveness: problem definition, positioning, coalition-building, and governance. While sharing the argument of the essay concerned, in this commentary, we argue that these analytical concepts can be used to explicate a concept that h...

متن کامل

Toward Carbon Governance

Nations, regions, local communities and individuals are currently moving toward or are in the process of implementing actions to reduce carbon dioxide emissions because of concern over global warming (Moser this issue). Managing “carbon sinks,” i.e. deliberately storing carbon in land vegetation and soils or ocean waters, has been strongly promoted and accepted by some as a mechanism to accompl...

متن کامل

Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?

The year 2016 could turn out to be a turning point for global health, new political realities and global insecurities will test governance and financing mechanisms in relation to both people and planet. But most importantly political factors such as the global power shift and “the rise of the rest” will define the future of global health. A new mix of health inequity and security challenges has...

متن کامل

On the Path to UHC – Global Evidence Must Go Local to Be Useful; Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”

The Disease Control Priorities (DCP) publications have pioneered new ways of thinking about investing in health. We agree with Norheim, that a useful first step to advance efforts to translate DCP’s global evidence into local health priorities, is to develop a clear Theory of Change (ToC). However, a ToC that aims to define how global evidence (DCP and others) can be used to inform national pol...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007